21 Comments
User's avatar
Pablo Hill's avatar

The bias comes to mind. Most people developed a bias to justify their thoughts and actions. We see it today in economic, climate, health, crime, & education data. A lot of this topic are taboo but if you look through the data you generally find that the narrative does not follow the truth. We hear phrases, like yea but or I feel instead of this is what the data says. As I have become older I see this more and more to the point where I find myself not wanting to engage with my follow citizen because it is self defeating. We have never have more information available than we do today, yet people do not want to believe it. They rather cherry pick making the narrative stick. Review what happen with Covid-which is happen with climate change today.

Expand full comment
Hedge Row's avatar

It can be tiresome sometimes, and you deserve a break once in a while, but don't ever give up on speaking openly (politely but firmly) to people around you about the facts. The stakes have never been higher.

Expand full comment
yomom's avatar

You say:

“Having talked to a lot of people in recent months, the truth is that most people have built their financial plans around yields staying low, or even worse have large mortgages that they cannot finance at higher levels.”

I absolutely agree with this statement but this holds true for old people who have paid off their mortgage as equally as for the young as well, because of 401k plans and the fact that basically the entire wealth of some societies in the west (especially AU,CA,UK + the US) is tied to stock and bond markets.

Everyone is aware of this so how should it be possible for yields to rise materially further if it becomes the most serious political risk?

It’s the same behavior and incentive scheme for governments acting as “wealth cartels” as for tech companies building price cartels.

I find it very difficult to believe that governments in the west would let a central bank independently push rates higher, even if it’d be the “right thing to do”.

Maybe the answer is fiscal policy….

Expand full comment
bill o'grady's avatar

Brilliantly stated! I started my career as an Forex analyst in March 1986 in the early stages of what is probably the greatest dollar bear market in history. I was confidently bearish too because I didn’t live through the earlier bull market. The “seasoned” guys kept trying to buy it and get clobbered.

Later, when I ran a futures research department I would have the ag guys offer an opinion on the financial futures on the idea that a smart analyst casually looking at another market could sometimes see the “forest” better than the analyst assigned to the sector.

It’s hard to be flexible on markets when you create a narrative. There were several guys who got out of equities in 2008. I don’t know of many who got back in at a good spot.

Expand full comment
Russell Clark's avatar

Its very tough to do. I think Buffett does a good job as he looks at bond yield to earning yields, and has a really good political feeling. I think a lot of fund managers are weak at politics

Expand full comment
Clement's avatar

Why is that, you think?

I mean, there's no shortage of political analysis and 'commentary' these days

Expand full comment
Russell Clark's avatar

I think politicians are only one part of politics - institutions area major part. In 2016 china.closed capital.account, we had brexit and trump. These were all institutional changes - very different to a new party being elected

Expand full comment
Clement's avatar

That is true.

Ditto the cancelling of Ant Financial IPO

What about the issuance of EU wide bonds?

All very consequential

Expand full comment
AAA21's avatar

Good observations. Of course, the fact that PRICE = TRUTH is what makes such a fan of Trend Following.

Expand full comment
CB's avatar

In our deeply financialized economy, I can't imagine rates hitting 10% without triggering a recession and bank insolvency crisis that gives the Fed cover to cut rates and resume QE. I fear the political pressure on the Fed to accommodate government spending will soon overwhelm the stable dollar and low unemployment mandates anyway. The free market price may be 10%, but we'll never see it.

Expand full comment
Russell Clark's avatar

If wages are rising at 10% a year or so, 10% interest rates will be fine for markets

Expand full comment
DeepBlue's avatar

What interest rate do you think can be tolerated on US National Debt of $55 trillion in the next decade?

Expand full comment
Russell Clark's avatar

That is the beauty of raising wages... nominal GDP expands quickly

Expand full comment
MM's avatar

"I can't imagine rates hitting 10% "

I said the same thig about 5% rates when the Fed first started hiking. But look where we are now.

Expand full comment
Clement's avatar

I can see the US 30 year at 6% but without a signpost on inflation it's not meaningful.

The key question is where CPI stabilises, a 2% real yield on TIPS is too high in my opinion.

Expand full comment
MM's avatar

With 15 years of ultra-low rates, many companies & gov'ts have gotten addicted to easy money. They don't want to believe that rates will remain higher.

Watching the post-FOMC press confrences, some of the financial reporters are practically begging Powell for rate cuts. The Fed Funds futures market (& SOFR 3-month curves etc) constantly "predict" rates will be lower and end up correcting up...

You're right about many not seeing the truth of higher rates.

Expand full comment
Adrian Garcia's avatar

I believe Hugh Hendry has commentary on this and I think his sense is that there’s a path to getting to higher rates but first there will be lower rates.

Expand full comment
Bob Bedford's avatar

Love that way of thinking of it, and love the short 30Y.

At the same time, at some point, the Fed and the Treasury find another 4-letter bazooka to save the long end. They've proven willing and able to do that many times over now. Can I see a 5.5% 30Y, yep.

Above that, they come in riding horse YCC style. They need a buyer of treasuries - if it's not end users then it has to be the Fed.

Expand full comment
Bob Bedford's avatar

But yes - TLT denominated in GLD is very smart. Real returns on treasuries are going to suck ass whatever happens.

Expand full comment
Fedor's avatar

I just read a recent note from another favorite, Albert Edwards. What happens if the US does adopt yield curve control? Will the truth be 3% 10-year rates? Will inflation be expressed in commodities?

Expand full comment
Russell Clark's avatar

Thats why i like GLD/TLT... covers that outcome

Expand full comment